FMFBDSM
09-20-2007, 06:11 AM
Good. Congress should not be trying to run a war. No doubt it would have been vetoe'd anyway. Funny how the real agenda of trying to cut and run instead of just giving troops more time at home wasn't played up in the media.
By Jill Zuckman
September 20, 2007
WASHINGTON - After a heated, all-day debate on the Senate floor that pitted combat veterans against combat veterans and one former secretary of the Navy against another, lawmakers failed to require the Pentagon to give U.S. troops as much time to rest at home as they spend in the theater overseas.
It was a significant defeat for critics of the Iraq war, who have been trying for months to withdraw troops over President Bush's objection.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/bal-te.warvote20sep20,0,2319200.story
By Jill Zuckman
September 20, 2007
WASHINGTON - After a heated, all-day debate on the Senate floor that pitted combat veterans against combat veterans and one former secretary of the Navy against another, lawmakers failed to require the Pentagon to give U.S. troops as much time to rest at home as they spend in the theater overseas.
It was a significant defeat for critics of the Iraq war, who have been trying for months to withdraw troops over President Bush's objection.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/bal-te.warvote20sep20,0,2319200.story