I am looking to upgrade from my entry-level Specialized Allez. According to my measurements I should get a compact geometry frame. I'd like ot stay in the $2,000-$2,500 range. I want a really good bike that will last a long time, but I don't plan on racing.

The two bikes I'm looking at the most are the Specialized Roubaix Comp and the Litespeed Siena. The Siena would probably cost me more but I'd do it if it's worth it.

Any recommendations on these? Are there other bikes I should consider?

Thanks

I would take a look at at TCR1 if your lbs has any. I looked at the Roubaix and the TCR1 this spring and decided on the Giant because of the way in climbed and the better components.

You will be surprised what $2500 can get you. Just bought a brand new 2004 Siena for $2500. Check out e-bay got mine from milos_dad, he owns a store so you will be able to register your bike w/ Litespeed. Mine was a medium Siena with a triple Campy. He is a very good seller, with 100% feedback. Its a great bike especially for the price!

GOOD LUCK!

You must have extreme proportions (very short legs relative to torso) to have your measurements say you "should get a compact geometry frame." The only thing a compact (sloping top tube) frame gives you is a lower standover height for a given top tube length. Are you sure this isn't just a bike shop selling compact frames? As to which bike to choose, start with getting the fit right, and then see which one you like when you ride it. After that, it's your own analysis of the value vs. cost of a given component mix and the value to you of getting a lifetime frame like the Sienna.

You must have extreme proportions (very short legs relative to torso) to have your measurements say you "should get a compact geometry frame." The only thing a compact (sloping top tube) frame gives you is a lower standover height for a given top tube length. Are you sure this isn't just a bike shop selling compact frames? As to which bike to choose, start with getting the fit right, and then see which one you like when you ride it. After that, it's your own analysis of the value vs. cost of a given component mix and the value to you of getting a lifetime frame like the Sienna.


He could be built like I am. 30" inseam with 27.5" arms. That's why I ride a small TCR team, it's the only thing that really fits right with a reasonable sized stem.

You must have extreme proportions (very short legs relative to torso) to have your measurements say you "should get a compact geometry frame." The only thing a compact (sloping top tube) frame gives you is a lower standover height for a given top tube length. Are you sure this isn't just a bike shop selling compact frames? As to which bike to choose, start with getting the fit right, and then see which one you like when you ride it. After that, it's your own analysis of the value vs. cost of a given component mix and the value to you of getting a lifetime frame like the Sienna.

The only thing? Standover,thats it?

One: transfers frame weight to seat post, thereby allowing manufacturer to claim lower weight than comparable horizontal top tube bike. Total bike weight unchanged. Two: trendy. Whether these are actual advantages or just marketing hype, well . . .