Ok, so Cancellara won the TT.

Does anybody think he won it as clean as he pretends?

I have more respect for people who dope and who dare risk their career by not pouring on excessive bullshit. One thing is that the public begs to be deceived, another is to comply with their wishes.

Who cares. He seems like a nice guy.

Prove he's not clean.

If he hadn't won, someone else would have and that person would then get accused of doping. The solution is to have no one win a bike race.

He is a client of Cecchini.

I'm going to get all conspiracy laden here:

We know that Millar "won" the TT WC a few years ago, then got busted for EPO and stripped of his title.

Now if we assume that Millar really is "clean" now (and I sure hope that's the case), and if we assume that he put max effort and training into this ride, then surely someone that finishes several minutes ahead is at the very least suspect.

At anyrate I also hope Cancellara is clean.

Who cares. He seems like a nice guy.

What is so nice about him? Is it nice to put in such a huge effort to be loved by everybody, that you accept being a big focking hypocrite?

About the "everybody who is winning can be said to be doped" commentary; tell us something new. The difference is: everybody who is winning don't have to improve their achievement by talking to the press afterwards... (I won by a min, guess how good I would have been if I had doped as well.. no the conditions weren't that bad for the starters... anyway the best one won...) Sympathetic my a$$