bimini
09-29-2004, 07:10 AM
I'm trying to figure out if I stand a chance of getting a Cat 3 upgrade next year.
One of the problems we have here out in the cornfields is not having large turnouts for races. To get points towards Cat 3 you need to be in races with a field size greater than 30. This can be a problem.
In many of the road races here, all Catagories race together. There are some good 1,2 & 3s so getting a top 6 finish in these is not realistic for me (unless I get lucky).
Some races have a staggered start and then seperate placing for the different catagories. On these I stand a good chance for a top 6 (or at least 10) among the Cat 4 or 40+ riders. But, the field size of the individual category is often less than 30. The question is, do they consider the field size of all the racers on the course or just those within the category your racing in? Some race have a mass start of all categories but seperate placing by category, again, what is the effect?
A couple of similar questions in regards to crits. Most of the larger crits they do break up by category. But the field size of the individual category may be less than 30. Do they consider the field to be the size of the event or just the category?
Another thing that can happen in crits here is that they combine catagories. Lets say they combine 4 & 5s together and the total field is greater than 30, but there were only 20 Cat 4's in the race, would a top 6 finish be counted?
A slightly different question. Let's say they combine 3, 4, and 5 together and race at the same time. Let's say only 20 cat 4's are in the race. Then say I finished 11th overall, but 2nd within Cat 4. Would I get points towards Cat 3?
I know it's a bit complicated but if the definition of the field size is loose I stand a good chance of getting the upgrade. If they are sticklers I will look for a different overall goal.
One of the problems we have here out in the cornfields is not having large turnouts for races. To get points towards Cat 3 you need to be in races with a field size greater than 30. This can be a problem.
In many of the road races here, all Catagories race together. There are some good 1,2 & 3s so getting a top 6 finish in these is not realistic for me (unless I get lucky).
Some races have a staggered start and then seperate placing for the different catagories. On these I stand a good chance for a top 6 (or at least 10) among the Cat 4 or 40+ riders. But, the field size of the individual category is often less than 30. The question is, do they consider the field size of all the racers on the course or just those within the category your racing in? Some race have a mass start of all categories but seperate placing by category, again, what is the effect?
A couple of similar questions in regards to crits. Most of the larger crits they do break up by category. But the field size of the individual category may be less than 30. Do they consider the field to be the size of the event or just the category?
Another thing that can happen in crits here is that they combine catagories. Lets say they combine 4 & 5s together and the total field is greater than 30, but there were only 20 Cat 4's in the race, would a top 6 finish be counted?
A slightly different question. Let's say they combine 3, 4, and 5 together and race at the same time. Let's say only 20 cat 4's are in the race. Then say I finished 11th overall, but 2nd within Cat 4. Would I get points towards Cat 3?
I know it's a bit complicated but if the definition of the field size is loose I stand a good chance of getting the upgrade. If they are sticklers I will look for a different overall goal.