|
View Full Version : Lazy ? MR_GRUMPY 06-18-2004, 01:07 PM WASHINGTON - Blaming what he called "lazy" reporters for blurring the distinction, Vice President Dick Cheney said that while "overwhelming" evidence shows a past relationship between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaida, the Bush administration never accused Saddam of helping with the Sept. 11 attacks. What's next..........blaming the "stupid" American public. What a joke ! Bocephus Jones 06-18-2004, 01:09 PM WASHINGTON - Blaming what he called "lazy" reporters for blurring the distinction, Vice President Dick Cheney said that while "overwhelming" evidence shows a past relationship between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaida, the Bush administration never accused Saddam of helping with the Sept. 11 attacks. What's next..........blaming the "stupid" American public. What a joke ! I'm surprised he didn't call them the liberal media. Live Steam 06-18-2004, 07:41 PM I thought he should have called them what they really are, but he was nice about it! shannon 06-18-2004, 09:50 PM WASHINGTON - Blaming what he called "lazy" reporters for blurring the distinction, Vice President Dick Cheney said that while "overwhelming" evidence shows a past relationship between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaida, the Bush administration never accused Saddam of helping with the Sept. 11 attacks. What's next..........blaming the "stupid" American public. What a joke ! Exactly, who's going to take the blame eventually, the "stupid american public". Why did polls start showing that the american public thought there was a connection between Saddam and 911? I remember hearing the news and seeing those poles and wondering. It's all sounding like a blame game now, the military has got to be getting pissed, caught between a stupid public and a cowardly government. belfast-biker 06-19-2004, 01:51 AM Why did polls start showing that the american public thought there was a connection between Saddam and 911? Because it was cleverly insinuated very heavily by the administration. They were deceived. Up to them to do something about it come November. shannon 06-20-2004, 12:19 AM Because it was cleverly insinuated very heavily by the administration. They were deceived. Up to them to do something about it come November. It would have to be one hell of a landslide to make any kind of statement, and november sure seems far away. filtersweep 06-20-2004, 04:33 AM It would have to be one hell of a landslide to make any kind of statement, and november sure seems far away. Landslide? Even a margin of a few hundred votes to oust an incumbant makes quite a statement. |