View Full Version : US Death Toll in Iraq for May = 117; Higest in two years. Why?


spyderman
05-29-2007, 09:13 PM
This sux!

U.S. toll in Iraq climbs
May is the deadliest month this year. Diyala province's total tops that of notorious Al Anbar.
By Ned Parker, Times Staff Writer
8:09 PM PDT, May 29, 2007

Six U.S. soldiers were killed in a roadside bombing attack and two more in a helicopter crash in Diyala, the U.S. military announced Tuesday, as the eastern Iraqi province supplanted the notorious Al Anbar region as the most dangerous area outside the capital.

Those fatalities and two others announced Tuesday brought the U.S. troop death toll in May to 117, making it the deadliest month for American forces this year, and the bloodiest since the battles for Fallouja in April and November 2004, according to icasualties.org, a website that tracks casualties in Iraq.

Violence in Diyala has been on the rise even before the Feb. 13 launch of the U.S. troop buildup in Baghdad. U.S. forces have found themselves battling multiple factions, including members of former dictator Saddam Hussein's Baath Party, foreign-led Al Qaeda forces, and Shiite Muslim militias, which the U.S. military says use armor-piercing bombs.

After three years of single-digit fatalities in Diyala, the U.S. military death toll there climbed to 16 in January and rose to 22 this month.

Army Lt. Col. Christopher Garver, a U.S. military spokesman, said the rising toll resulted from the doubling of U.S. forces in Diyala, where they have battled Al Qaeda and insurgent groups that have moved there from Al Anbar province in western Iraq. He also linked the fatalities to the Baghdad offensive, which has seen an additional 28,000 troops deployed to Baghdad and its outlying areas.

"We knew that one of the outcomes of the increased pressure in Baghdad was you press them in the center, they ooze out the sides," Garver said.

"There is also pressure being put on Al Qaeda in Al Anbar as well, so we are seeing Diyala become the new hotspot," he added.

The farming province famous for its date and orange groves borders Iran and is home to Sunni and Shiite Muslims, thousands of whom have been uprooted by sectarian violence. The U.S. Army's Task Force Lightning deployed an additional 3,000-member brigade there in May, bringing its force to about 6,000, according to the military.

U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Benjamin Mixon, the commander in charge of northern Iraq, said in mid-May that he needed more soldiers. "I do not have enough soldiers in Diyala province to keep that security situation moving," he told reporters.

Among the reinforcements brought to Diyala was a Stryker battalion, but even these armored vehicles have proved vulnerable to bombs. Six U.S. soldiers and a Russian photographer were killed May 6 when an explosion ripped through a Stryker vehicle.

Garver said a final brigade due to be in place in Baghdad by mid-June could have elements shifted to Diyala if U.S. commanders decided it was necessary.

Although U.S. casualties weren't high in Diyala before January, the province already was a deadly place for locals. Assassinations regularly targeted mayors, tribal chiefs, police officials and judges.

The commander of the Iraqi army in Diyala, Brig. Gen. Shakir Hulail Hussein Kaabi, was relieved of his duties this month amid criticism for heavy-handed tactics against Diyala's Sunni population. Kaabi was reportedly picked for his job by the Badr Organization, a Shiite militia.

U.S. and Iraqi officials in January had attributed Diyala's rampant violence to their decision last year to hand over security responsibilities to Iraqi forces, which proved to be unprepared for the task.

The U.S. troop death toll in Al Anbar, meanwhile, has dropped dramatically this year as the western province's tribes have turned on Al Qaeda and cooperated with the Americans. In December, 47 U.S. troops were killed in the province, home to restive cities such as Fallouja and Ramadi. In May, that toll dropped to 16.

The number of U.S. fatalities in the Iraqi capital has not dropped even though insurgents have fled Baghdad and Al Anbar for Diyala.

Fifty U.S. soldiers died in Baghdad in May, one fatality shy of the record, reached in April, according to icasualties.org.

Garver attributed the toll to the deployment of additional troops and the fact that they are operating at a more aggressive pace. "We've have more troops in Iraq than we've had for a long time. We are operating in more areas.... There is a greater chance of contact with the enemy," he said.

The cause of Monday's helicopter crash was unclear, the U.S. military said Tuesday. Few other details of the remaining deaths were released. The six soldiers who died in Diyala on Monday were killed by bomb blasts near their vehicles, and the two others were killed Monday in a bombing in Baghdad, military statements said.

ned.parker@latimes.com

KenB
05-30-2007, 03:41 AM
Why?


There are more of us there to kill?

Snakebit
05-30-2007, 03:42 AM
Because our efforts have been stepped up and more troops are involved in action on a daily basis by design.

the_rydster
05-30-2007, 03:51 AM
Seems like quite an organised and well thought out attack by the insurgents; to shoot down a chopper and then destroy two BFV's sent in to help.

I read on reuters that 5 brits were kidnapped from a government building in Baghdad. WTF! This was in broad daylight, with the kidnappers dressed as commandos and in official vehicles. Are their rogue elements in the interior ministry?

Snakebit
05-30-2007, 04:02 AM
Seems like quite an organised and well thought out attack by the insurgents; to shoot down a chopper and then destroy two BFV's sent in to help.

I read on reuters that 5 brits were kidnapped from a government building in Baghdad. WTF! This was in broad daylight, with the kidnappers dressed as commandos and in official vehicles. Are their rogue elements in the interior ministry?

Entirely possible. Pretty scarey place.

thatsmybush
05-30-2007, 04:07 AM
Entirely possible. Pretty scarey place.

Last throes and dead enders...nothing to concern yourself with.

Henry Porter
05-30-2007, 04:18 AM
:(

http://z.about.com/d/uspolitics/1/0/m/C/mission_accomplished.jpg

rufus
05-30-2007, 04:21 AM
Because our efforts have been stepped up and more troops are involved in action on a daily basis by design.

But I thought the Iraqi forces were suppposed to take the lead in this "surge", with our forces there as support? are you telling us that that isn't working? what happened to those 300,000 trained and ready Iraqi troops anyway?

rufus
05-30-2007, 04:23 AM
Are their rogue elements in the interior ministry?


Duh. welcome to 2005.

atpjunkie
05-30-2007, 09:05 AM
Surge in US casualties

have they secured any areas?

has anything improved?

spyderman
05-30-2007, 09:22 AM
Surge in US casualties

have they secured any areas?

has anything improved?

I believe part of their plan is to scatter small outposts throughout Iraq. Sounds like a police force or targets? I believe the latter is closer to the truth.

After 5 yrs these fools don't know what the f*ck they're doin'?

I wonder what the conversations of the 'retired' military leaders sound like?

il sogno
05-30-2007, 06:19 PM
Surge in US casualties

have they secured any areas?

has anything improved?
Bush has "surged" our troops into more dangerous areas and our guys are paying the ultimate price.

carbfib
05-30-2007, 07:42 PM
and (meantime) That this may be an additional way for Bush to have the Immis of any nationality [esp the flood next to US] take over the U.S. --- as those born in the United States are dying for US.