Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1

    cervelo s2 vs r3

    can you help me to choose between these 2 bikes?

  2. #2
    Fly on a windshield
    Reputation: MG537's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,262
    Depends on what's most important to you. Weight vs. aerodynamics, if you believe the Cervélo website. Others may say comfort vs. speed-demon.

    In my case I went with, in theory at least, the most comfortable bike (R3) 'cause roads around here sometimes feel like you're riding the pavé at Paris-Roubaix.

    Conclusion: The best judge for this is you. Test ride both, with identical components if possible and see for yourself. Either way you're choosing a great bike.

    Now time for the "why don't you try a Look/Colnago/Pinarello/etc." crowd can join in.
    God gave up this world, its people long ago.....Peter Gabriel 1971

  3. #3
    Deliciously Ironic
    Reputation: Rollo Tommassi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,021

    Two completely different rides

    The S2 (ex Soloist) is a much stiffer ride, in my experience, than the R3. Both ride very smoothly, but I found the Soloist too much for me: I'm not the strongest/biggest person out there, so I don't bend a frame much to begin with. I ride a 51 size, so all my frame tubes are pretty damn small.

    I also felt that the Soloist gave me difficulty with side wind, most noticeable on a big descent.

    The R3 is my favorite, it's butter smooth and very springy when climbing or sprinting.

    Definitely do a test ride.
    mohair_chair: And everyone knows that a menstruating woman attracts bears

    buy my old bike stuff: https://sites.google.com/site/carbonscyclingcloset/

    my playlist on Blip.fm: http://blip.fm/rollotommassi

  4. #4
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    10,126

    neither one...

    Really, it depends on the size. I tried a 51cm R3 in 2006 and was totally unimpressed. The geometry if is odd and the ride rough. Larger sizes have more normal geometry. The 49 and 51cm are ridiculouly short.

  5. #5
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    72

    Post over at the Cervelo Forum

    There are a bunch of guys over there pretty familiar with their bikes:
    http://forums.cervelo.com/forums/5.aspx

    I think that the guy at Competitive Cyclist summed it up very wisely. He said that if your an enthusiast that occasionally races then go with the R3, however if you're a racer first then the S1/S2 may be the better choice.

    For someone like me climbing ability is much more important than all out speed that would be influenced by the aero shapes of the Cervelo S series bikes. I absolutely love my RS, and would expect the R3 to be even faster.
    Derek
    --The shade tree mechanic

  6. #6
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    3
    I looked at both, and ended up going the route of the S2. At 5'11" and 175 lbs, the ride is just fine. This does not beat me up at all - and that was a huge concern since I was transitioning from a titanium bike. The bike is fast. REAL FAST. Every pedal stroke is transferred, and descents are just faster. My big question was S2 vs. S3. In the end I picked up a 2009 S2 frame at a good price and spent the savings on upgraded parts. SRAM Red group, FSA K-Force Ti crank, K-Wing bar, Zero Gravity brakes. Love this one!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails cervelo s2 vs r3-s2.jpg  

  7. #7
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    4
    I went with the r3 SL. I weigh 160 and climb well and there are a lot of hills where I ride. The bike is superb. The only downside is that the bike is not very aero. The fork is but the squoval tunes aren't. If you don't ride real fast this won't matter much but if you get over twenty very often it is a hindrance. With aero wheels it's most noticeable in that I can feel air turbulence coming off the downtube. In a group it's not noticed.

    The bike climbs very well at 6100 grams with race wheels. For climbing it's likely better than an S2 or 3 and an S series is better for flats and rollers which is what most people ride primarliy..

  8. #8
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation: balatoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    414
    I have a Cervelo S2 and a Look 585. I chose S2 because I already have an comfortable bike (Look 585). I have to say, S2 is stiffer than Look 585, but it is fast... well at least it looks fast! It's also very stable on descends. However, I did have trouble with side winds one day. I thought I was going to get blown over with side winds topping 20mph.

    I pretty much limit my S2 to rides 50 miles or less. If I am doing a century, Look 585 is my go to bike.
    2013 Giant Anthem Advanced X29.

    2008 Look 585 - Great Bike!

    2010 Lynskey R230 - Comfortable!

    2012 Wilier Cross Carbon

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

INTERBIKE

Hot Deals

Interbike Featured Booths

Check out the hottest road bike products from these brands!



















See All Interbike Coverage - Click Here »


Latest RoadBike Articles


Latest Videos

RoadbikeReview on Facebook