I'm looking at getting a CAAD9. I've read that unlike steel or carbon, aluminum will eventually fatigue and fail. How long would this likely take? Is it the kind of thing where it could realistically fail in 5 years, or is it the kind of thing where it would take 50 years of hard riding to fail?
ahh jeez. propaganda, or should i say its a prejudice against alu from the carbon and steel folks... any decent design will not see this be a factor in your lifetime...
anyways, u said u're looking at a caad9. lifetime warantee. Ride it and be happy.
ahh jeez. propaganda, or should i say its a prejudice against alu from the carbon and steel folks... any decent design will not see this be a factor in your lifetime...
anyways, u said u're looking at a caad9. lifetime warantee. Ride it and be happy.
I've had my CAAD4 R800 since 2002. Since then, I've averaged about 2,000-2,500 miles per year. It's had a close encounter with the top of my garage on my car roof racks and it's still rolling. After so long, I still smile at the brute acceleration of my CAAD4.
There's no reason the bike shouldn't last for many years, if properly used and maintained. Have no fear of buying aluminum, especially from a company that specializes in manufacturing bikes with it.
It may be true for pure aluminum (which is never used for bikes) or early alu-based alloys but current alloys are pretty durable... and from a company that has so many years of experience with the material like Cannondale? Not a concern IMO...
Barring design/manufacturing flaws...frames of any material will generally last until broken or wrecked in any episode that exceeds the capacities they are originally designed for....
unfortunately most human bodies will (like carbon) catastrophically fail when crashed and over time *fatigue* much faster than a CAAD:
Here here! I am a happy current owner of a CAAD4 r800 and have ridden it hard for 3 years (commuting and recreation) prior to that it was owned by a Good fellow at our best LBS Smoothcycle. I can't imagine he did not ride the balls off it.
Still going strong.
I have and further intend to upgrade parts but don't really feal the need for a new frame.
geez, guys, if you debunk the aluminum fatigue myth then how will you justify the purchase of a new frame to your significant others? i mean, "catastrophic failure" went along way to getting me on the saddle of a new system six.
geez, guys, if you debunk the aluminum fatigue myth then how will you justify the purchase of a new frame to your significant others? i mean, "catastrophic failure" went along way to getting me on the saddle of a new system six.
I found most of these testimonies to be quite encouraging about aluminum. However, you do hear about aluminum horror stories of sudden catastrophic failure and you also encounter articles like the following: www.livestrong.com/article/87520-bike-frame-aluminum-vs.-steel/
A chromoly steel bicycle will last just as long as titanium, if kept dry.
I found most of these testimonies to be quite encouraging about aluminum. However, you do hear about aluminum horror stories of sudden catastrophic failure and you also encounter articles like the following: www.livestrong.com/article/87520-bike-frame-aluminum-vs.-steel/
Now THAT is funny, using a Livestrong article to bring a myth to light....
Now THAT is funny, using a Livestrong article to bring a myth to light....
So what's wrong with Livestrong? I always thought quite highly of them...It is true that aluminum has fatigue issues. We just don't know the extent to which these issues exist!
A chromoly steel bicycle will last just as long as titanium, if kept dry.
I have a 2010 CAAD9 with about 8,000 miles on it. I wish the frame would give out so I could have a excuse to buy a new one....not a sign of wear on it yet.
I have a 2010 CAAD9 with about 8,000 miles on it. I wish the frame would give out so I could have a excuse to buy a new one....not a sign of wear on it yet.
Then that's great news!
A chromoly steel bicycle will last just as long as titanium, if kept dry.
@zeet, have you actually experienced a failure of aluminum or are you just obsessed with the idea that aluminum is somehow inferior? My personal experience was several C'dale frames from the 90's has been nothing short of spectacular. That said, I'd rather ride one of my steel bikes as a personal preference (they are lighter and I have more money invested in them). Aluminum is fine unless you wreck it.
@zeet, have you actually experienced a failure of aluminum or are you just obsessed with the idea that aluminum is somehow inferior? My personal experience was several C'dale frames from the 90's has been nothing short of spectacular. That said, I'd rather ride one of my steel bikes as a personal preference (they are lighter and I have more money invested in them). Aluminum is fine unless you wreck it.
True. I do feel that I have some kinda latent subconscious Aluminum phobia, due to the fact that I've heard so many horror stories about Aluminum in the past. I've only personally witnessed one Aluminum failure, but I've witnessed three steel failures. However, that's only because I grew up during a time where the cycling scene was comprised primarily of steel bikes. Aluminum abruptly merged into the scene much later. I just sold my Trek 7.5FX and now, for some reason I miss it already...I'm now beginning to think more and more about a Synapse with brake levers on the hood.
A chromoly steel bicycle will last just as long as titanium, if kept dry.
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by wankski
