Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    7

    Looking to upgrade CAAD 7 with a CAAD 12, but what size ?

    Hi Hi,

    I am looking at finally making the jump from a CAAD 7 to a CAAD 12. The CAAD 7 I have is a 54cm, but I have been reading (mostly on here) about the change in geometry of the 2017 CAAD 12 frameset. Any advice on what size I should get will be gratefully received.

    Cheers

  2. #2
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation: bikerjulio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,975
    In the 54 cm size I'm not seeing any significant differences. Stack and reach are identical. As are tube lengths etc. See for yourself. There is a difference in the standover dimension which is hard to explain given that the stack and BB height dimensions are virtually identical. Errors do creep into these charts sometimes, like the labelling errors.



    Last edited by bikerjulio; 6 Days Ago at 06:12 AM.
    There's sometimes a buggy.
    How many drivers does a buggy have?

    One.

    So let's just say I'm drivin' this buggy...
    and if you fix your attitude you can ride along with me.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GekiIMh4ZkM

  3. #3
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation: velodog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    5,382
    Seat tube length.
    Too old to ride plastic

  4. #4
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation: bikerjulio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,975
    Yes, but the way Cannondale show it, it's irrelevant. The important thing is the angle.

    There's something not quite right anyway (other than the messed up A and B labels), In that the older frames had a horizontal TT, and the new ones look even more horizontal.

    If stack, reach, TT, HT, wheelbase, setback, and all the angles are the same, then for all practical purposes, the frames are interchangeable.
    There's sometimes a buggy.
    How many drivers does a buggy have?

    One.

    So let's just say I'm drivin' this buggy...
    and if you fix your attitude you can ride along with me.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GekiIMh4ZkM

  5. #5
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation: velodog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    5,382
    Quote Originally Posted by bikerjulio View Post
    Yes, but the way Cannondale show it, it's irrelevant. The important thing is the angle.

    There's something not quite right anyway (other than the messed up A and B labels), In that the older frames had a horizontal TT, and the new ones look even more horizontal.

    If stack, reach, TT, HT, wheelbase, setback, and all the angles are the same, then for all practical purposes, the frames are interchangeable.
    If the TT is "even more horizontal" that would raise the stand over height, seeing as the HT length stayed the same. And the taller TT and longer stand over looks to run thru all sizes, so I would guess that they leveled the TT or erred across the board with their figures.

    If the top chart is for the CAAD7, could the 7 have a sloping TT and the 12 a level TT? That would explain the taller ST and longer stand over.
    Too old to ride plastic

  6. #6
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation: bikerjulio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,975
    Quote Originally Posted by velodog View Post
    If the TT is "even more horizontal" that would raise the stand over height, seeing as the HT length stayed the same. And the taller TT and longer stand over looks to run thru all sizes, so I would guess that they leveled the TT or erred across the board with their figures.

    If the top chart is for the CAAD7, could the 7 have a sloping TT and the 12 a level TT? That would explain the taller ST and longer stand over.
    One nice thing about Cannondale is that they stuck to the same geometry since the beginning of time. I don't believe there was any change between the CAAD5, that I have here and the CAAD7. And my CAAD TT is dead horizontal, or at least within a few mm of horizontal. The "more horizontal" was my feeble attempt at humor.

    A picture is worth many words, and if anything the CAAD12 appears to slope a little, which you would think would reduce the standover. But no. So there is a little bit of mystery, but I don't see anything worth worrying about.

    Looking to upgrade CAAD 7 with a CAAD 12, but what size ?-mku2qo.jpg

    Last edited by bikerjulio; 6 Days Ago at 03:07 PM.
    There's sometimes a buggy.
    How many drivers does a buggy have?

    One.

    So let's just say I'm drivin' this buggy...
    and if you fix your attitude you can ride along with me.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GekiIMh4ZkM

  7. #7
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    7
    A 54cm it is then. Thanks bikerjulio !

Similar Threads

  1. CAAD 10-5 Brakes/ Pad Upgrade???
    By SwimCycle09 in forum Cannondale
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-19-2014, 09:05 AM
  2. 2012 CAAD 8 Sora vs 2013 CAAD 8 2300
    By nathey in forum Cannondale
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-26-2013, 03:04 PM
  3. New CAAD 10 soon, wheel upgrade?
    By ktc in forum Cannondale
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-21-2012, 06:42 PM
  4. Upgrade options for my '06 CAAD 8?
    By floxy in forum Cannondale
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-05-2009, 11:35 AM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-14-2004, 05:20 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •