Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    631

    House brand components

    Cr@p or what? You know why they do it (to save $$), but I only have one pair of Bontrager wheels that didn't crack and break on me in about a years time. Other parts like bars and stems and seatposts I can't get to excited about anyway, but cranks, brakes, gimme Shimano.

    I wonder if it's better to just buy a frame and put my own choice of components on it. We looked at my son's Madone, and found cheaper grades of cables, cassette, and chain as well. Probably headset too, but we didn't check that.
    Last edited by mfdemicco; 3 Weeks Ago at 06:48 AM.

  2. #2
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation: Lombard's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    6,593
    To be fair, Trek isn't the only brand that does this. This is how bike makers control costs. They put shiny expensive components where they show and slip cheaper components where you either aren't likely to notice or where cost savings will be the most.

    Bontrager wheels are mediocre at best. I really thought they solved the spoke hole cracking problem when they abandoned that stupid paired spoke design. Apparently not. I really have to wonder why Trek doesn't use an entry level Shimano wheelset like RS-11 or RS-21. Not exciting, but cheap, durable and at 1850g, not terrible in the weight department. And for a higher level bike, Ultegra WH-RS500s weigh in at around 1650g and are a great bang for the buck. If I, Mr. Consumer can buy these for under $300, it's only a guess Trek could bulk buy these for quite a bit less. So I don't quite understand what's up with that.

    Bars, stems, seatposts and water bottle holders are some things Trek actually does quite well. Nothing wrong with these.

    Cables, cassette and chain are wear items, so I wouldn't make a bike buying decision based on those.

    But a real WTF as far as I'm concerned is as inexpensive as cables are and how important they are to good quality shifting, why would Trek sub cheap cables on a high end bike? Seriously, they put cheap galvanized cables on expensive bikes! Good stainless steel cables aren't that expensive, they're PRICELESS! Did some bean counter at Trek corporate headquarters get a big bonus for this decision?? Yeeeesh!
    “Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital.” -- Aaron Levenstein

    "Beware of geeks bearing formulas."
    -- Warren Buffett

    "Education is what you get when you read the fine print. Experience is what you get when you don't. -- Pete Seeger



  3. #3
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation: OldZaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,064
    The vast majority of brands are just that - brands. They outsource the manufacturing to someone else. This isn't necessarily bad. Theoretically, that manufacturer has more experience making stuff. The brand's job is to ensure the design and engineering (also outsourced more and more) is done well. And, they're supposed to ensure the quality is on part with their brand's standards.

    You really have to research the parts you buy. There is a lot of private labeling (made exclusively for that company/brand) and white labeling (made for several companies/brands) in all manufacturing... the bike industry too.

    My Cannondale Hollowgram wheels are great. But Cannondale didn't make them. Stan's did. Well, the rims anyway. The hubs were soured from another manufacturer. So first, I had to research who was making those wheels for Cannondale... then research the Stan's wheels, e.g. reading reviews, etc.

    You can't stop when you figure out who makes a wheel (for example) for a bike company... because that bike company could have multiple manufacturers making different wheels for them.

  4. #4
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    8,323
    Just semantics but your beef is with "stock" components not "house brand". Bontrager, Giant, Cannondale, Most, they all have some decent stuff. Shimano, Mavic, Whatever all make some really cheap stuff that gets sold on bikes.

    You get what you pay for generally speaking. Most models, Madone being no exception, have different levels. At the high end you usually don't see these cheaper substitutions but the lower priced models are lower priced for a reason and that in part is lower end components. Sure buying a frame and your own stuff will get you better quality but you'll pay more accordingly. Actually more than accordingly unless your get some good sales because you don't have the buying power to drive bulk prices down like a big bike company can.

  5. #5
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    32
    Not all of it is bad. Cannondale has levels to theirs, I really like their C1 bars and stem.

  6. #6
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    631
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay Strongbow View Post
    Just semantics but your beef is with "stock" components not "house brand". Bontrager, Giant, Cannondale, Most, they all have some decent stuff. Shimano, Mavic, Whatever all make some really cheap stuff that gets sold on bikes.

    You get what you pay for generally speaking. Most models, Madone being no exception, have different levels. At the high end you usually don't see these cheaper substitutions but the lower priced models are lower priced for a reason and that in part is lower end components. Sure buying a frame and your own stuff will get you better quality but you'll pay more accordingly. Actually more than accordingly unless your get some good sales because you don't have the buying power to drive bulk prices down like a big bike company can.
    No, I was talking about house brand components (wheels, pedals, cranks, etc.), not accessories (shoes, helmets, etc.) Also, IMO, even the expensive house brand components suck.

Similar Threads

  1. which size from one brand matches other brand?
    By royta in forum Bikes, Frames and Forks
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-05-2012, 03:38 PM
  2. motobecane... good brand or bad brand?
    By Morisato in forum Motobecane - Mercier
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-05-2011, 03:50 PM
  3. Name Brand vs Non Name Brand
    By demus in forum Bikes, Frames and Forks
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-22-2007, 08:57 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT ROADBIKEREVIEW

VISIT US AT

roadbikereview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.