advanced search

Forum Guidelines
Posting Photos

Go Back   Road Bike, Cycling Forums > Classic Forums > Components, Wrenching
User Name
Password


advanced search
Forum Jump

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-08-2010   #1
dockay
RoadBikeReview Member

user gallery  
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 14
Software analyzing ride stats

I have a edge 500 which is sweet. The computer does not have max grade % ascent, max grade % descent or average grade percentage for the ride.

The edge enables me to export a file that maps the ride. Does anyone know of software or websites that can read .tcx (or other related file types) and provide the max grade percentages for ascent and descent (plus average grade percentage)?

Thanks,

Michael
dockay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2010   #2
Windermere

user gallery  
Posts: n/a
.............

Last edited by Windermere : 02-09-2010 at 11:01 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2010   #3
dockay
RoadBikeReview Member

user gallery  
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 14
Thanks Windermere. I'll give it a try.
dockay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2010   #4
ukbloke
RoadBikeReview Member

user gallery  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,490
Try SportTracks. It has a wide range of statistics which it can display. I'm not sure if it can download from the 500 directly yet since the file format changed. I'm also not 100% sure if the max ascent and descent are specifically picked out, but you can always pick them off one of its graphs.

Average grade percentage for a ride is usually not all that meaningful - for example, if you end up returning to the start your net elevation change is zero! You could compute total ascent over total distance, and total descent over total distance, I suppose. SportTracks can also report its stats on a lap by lap basis, and this can be really useful if you want to focus in on specific parts of your ride (e.g. a particular hill climb).
__________________
"I think," said Christopher Robin, "that we ought to eat all our Provisions now, so that we shan't have so much to carry.", Winnie-the-Pooh, A. A. Milne.

See my latest bike video at Descent of Kings Mountain Road . More at www.biketelemetry.com.
ukbloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2010   #5
dockay
RoadBikeReview Member

user gallery  
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 14
Thanks. I was not sufficiently specific about avg grade. The stat I'm looking for is average ascent grade and average descent grade. That's the helpful for me to gauge effort involved and especially in relation to average mph.

I like your idea about focusing on specific parts of the ride and tracking them via the laps.
dockay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2010   #6
Windermere

user gallery  
Posts: n/a
............

Last edited by Windermere : 02-09-2010 at 11:01 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2010   #7
Dr_John
RoadBikeReview Member
 
Dr_John's Avatar

user gallery  
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,234
Quote:
I'm not sure if it can download from the 500 directly yet since the file format changed.
It can't.

Also, if you export .tcx from Garmin Connect, it won't import power data. However, exporting from Garmin Training Center will give a .tcx file from which SportsTracks can import power data.
Dr_John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2010   #8
danl1
Steaming piles of opinion
 
danl1's Avatar

user gallery  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,541
Training Center answers the meaningful questions you ask, and was built for the Garmin.

As noted earlier, average ascent / descent for a ride doesn't have much meaning, and really would always = zero. But you know that, as hinted by your 'in relation to speed' follow up comment. But kick that ball just a little forward - in looking at it in relation to speed, what you are really looking to gauge is VAM - vertical ascent (in meters per hour.)

OK, but TC, Sport Tracks, and ridewithgps don't calculate VAM. That's OK, because as a ride statistic, it's not very meaningful. It arguably only becomes meaningful during an ascent of roughly >7%. For how you seem to be using your stats, total ascent over time might be the closest thing to a useful metric.

One other suggestion: Give Trainingpeaks.com a try. Even the free version dusts the things recommended previously, and the subscription is very useful for those serious about training. A bit spendy for my tastes, but very nice.
__________________
Truth begins as heresy and ends as supersition.
danl1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:38 AM.


 


Loading...



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Copyright ©1996-2008 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda      RSS Feed