I bought a second hand bike with old, but low mileage, Conti Grand Prix tires. 3,500 miles later I had my first puncture flat from a simple staple. Both tires are fairly squared off, but I'm wondering how much longer I should ride on them.
I have new GP 4KS tires in the box, but don't want to waste any mileage the old tires still have unless the new tires have significantly better puncture resistance. If the staple would have likely punctured the 4KS, too, no need to change just yet. I thought some GP 4KS users might have a better idea than me. Thanks.
On what authoritative basis can you say Tri-Comps are better resisting flats than Conti Grand Prix (S, or otherwise)? I have sold thousands of sets of tires (Primarily Conti, Vredestein and Vittoria) While Tri-Comps are excellent tires, the feedback I have gotten from customers mirrors my own experience, the Contis offer superior flat protection as compared to the Tri-Comps. Personally I have had as good of luck with the 4000S as I have with Gatorskins.
Conti puts two small dimples on the wear surface of their Grand Prix tires as wear indicators. The dimples are usually between 1 and 3" apart. If you can still see these dimples, you are good to go.
Conti does offer the "wear indicator" dimples in the tires, but in my experience, I end up tossing the tires well before the dimples wear through because of cuts and gashes in the tires. This is one reason why I'm currently exploring other replacement alternatives to Conti.
That was another beef I had with the contis. On a few of them, not all, the dimples would say there was still plenty of rubber, but there would be thin spots elsewhere, down to the threads once or twice IIRC. After that, I made it a pre-ride check to examine the tires in bright sunlight before riding.
After buying lots of them, I just think the contis are over priced and ridiculously over rated, mostly by people who equate the high price with quality, and people who have never ridden any other tire.
I live in an area with tons of cyclists. I would say in a big group ride, 1/2 - 2/3 are riding GP4000S. Very popular tires. I've been using them for years. I put 5k mi on a set last year. Zero flats. I changed them out this year for a new set ($40 ea online). The dimples were still there. Cant ask for much better.
ditto.
For years I have run 4000s exclusively for training and racing and go an average of about 8,000 miles between flats (not that a get that much on one set of tires),
There is quantifiable data that they have about the best wet grip around, are near the top for dry grip and for rolling resistance and weight.
I'm sorry, but if you have a problem with them, it's bad luck, not the norm for those tires.
I also
pay about $40 for them online. Really the only thing close is eve open corsas and they're only close because they are prob a tad grippier in the dry and have at most 1 watt better RR.
There is real data that indicates they aren't as flat proof and they are widely known to be scary in the wet.
nothing not to like about the contis. they're even more aero.
Not to be a pill here, but I think you should try some top-end vreds before you declare that contis the best.
I honestly guarantee that you won't be sorry.
Again, I was a long-time conti rider who, on a whim, tried some vred fortezza superlites which were on sale. It opened my eyes to what I had been missing.
Nothing meant personal, but why would I? If I have no issues with the tires, they don't flat for me etc, I can get them for $40 routinely, and every test known to mankind puts them at or near the top in every category of performance? and the few tests I can find that include Vreds seem to have them pretty much in the middle of the pack.
Havent noticed any yet that handle Vred rolling resistance, but if they're in the middle of the pack on that, too, you're essentially asking me to throw away wattage equal to perhaps 5 percent of the performance gains Ive made with a year of hard training... on top of another watt or two of aero drag.
And some of these tests include data on puncture resistance...
People look for patterns, and if someone gets, strictly by coincidence, a group of two or three flats relatively close in time, even though they have been on the same tires for years with no problem, some jump to the conclusion that the tires are junk, suddenly. That's what drives a great number of posts in such forums, the one person, or the 7 out of 10,000 etc, who has problems and perceives a pattern puts out their gripes. It's like angry people, who always vote in larger numbers. Why would someone who's happy with a tire start a thread about it?
Here is one small sample of the tests out there, you can google up more pretty easily.
Another new tyre, the Fortezza SuperLite differs from its Fortezza stablemates in lacking a puncture resistant strip. This saves some weight - it's under 200g - and makes for a fast-rolling tyre.
It came a respectable fourth in our roll-down tests, just off the podium positions held by the two Michelins and the Supersonic. Puncture resistance is understandably not great, though perhaps slightly better than the Supersonic. What the tread life will be is anybody's guess.
Vredestein claim it's "developed for all types of road racing" but for anything other than solo efforts you'd probably be better off with the Vredestein Fortezza TriComp (or, indeed, the Michelin Pro 2 Race). It's rated to 174psi, which is unusually high for a 23mm clincher; heavy riders could benefit from this. The casing has 120tpi. Vredestein Fortezza SuperLite review - BikeRadar
Another GP4000S fan here. They roll great, I rarely get punctures and I get 6k miles out of a rear tire. I'm itching to try a 28mm GP4000S II on my rear wheel (but nobody has them in stock yet.)
I have over 1000 miles on a pair of 25 mm GP4000S II, no flats or problems.
I really like them! Smooth, and fast.
Try sourcing them on EBay versus typical UK based sellers. Prices now are under 100. / pair free priority shipping. Last winter in off season they were about 90. / pair shipped on Ebay.
The II is a different tire from the I, at least from inspection of the side casing. My recall was the side casing on the I had a slight gloss, where the II is a flat/dull black finish.
The 23's and 25's are pretty easy to find. But the 28 is vaporware at this point. Nobody has them. Not even at extortion level prices ($80+ shipped for one tire.) I just noticed that Cambria Bikes moved their ETA on the 28's from 6/25 back to 8/25 so there must be something going on. My guess is that the demand for the 28's was much higher than Continental anticipated.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Road Bike, Cycling Forums
5.4M posts
205K members
Since 1990
A forum community dedicated to Road Bike owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about bike parts, components, deals, performance, modifications, classifieds, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more!