CAAD12 to Evo Hi-Mod....sizing
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Witty custom user title
    Reputation: E 12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    550

    CAAD12 to Evo Hi-Mod....sizing

    So I've been riding a CAAD12 for sometime now in a 54. I've had people tell me that they thought it was too big (just based on geometry numbers, not necessarily how I looked on it). I'm ALMOST 5'8, like just barely under. Anyway, I've ridden the 54 with a 100mm stem for a long time, and never felt like I was on something too big. That said, I'm looking to move to an Evo, and obviously started looking at a 54. The geometry says that the Evo is a tiny bit smaller than the CAAD12 (at least the seat tube). But would there be a reason to also look at a 52? I'm not totally sure what I'd gain from it, but maybe placing my reach further over the front axle or something?

  2. #2
    tlg
    tlg is online now
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation: tlg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    13,873
    Quote Originally Posted by E 12 View Post
    The geometry says that the Evo is a tiny bit smaller than the CAAD12 (at least the seat tube).
    No it doesn't. The seat tube length is totally meaningless in the bike size. It just means you have a more sloping top tube and more seat post exposed.

    Top tube length, stack, and reach are the important numbers and they're all identical. In fact, everything is identical except for the seat tube.

    I'm 5'9" and I ride a 56 Evo. I like a longer top tube and feel too squished on a 54. I think a 54 would be right for you. You could try a 52 and see what you think. I'd recommend trying a 52 CAAD12 though. Just so you have an apples to apples comparison on the fit. The EVO is going to feel different being carbon and you don't want that influencing your decision. Or at least ride a 52 and 54 EVO back to back.
    Custom Di2 & Garmin/GoPro mounts 2013 SuperSix EVO Hi-MOD Team * 2004 Klein Aura V

  3. #3
    dfdf
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    336
    Quote Originally Posted by E 12 View Post
    So I've been riding a CAAD12 for sometime now in a 54. I've had people tell me that they thought it was too big (just based on geometry numbers, not necessarily how I looked on it). I'm ALMOST 5'8, like just barely under. Anyway, I've ridden the 54 with a 100mm stem for a long time, and never felt like I was on something too big. That said, I'm looking to move to an Evo, and obviously started looking at a 54. The geometry says that the Evo is a tiny bit smaller than the CAAD12 (at least the seat tube). But would there be a reason to also look at a 52? I'm not totally sure what I'd gain from it, but maybe placing my reach further over the front axle or something?
    I have a 54 Caad 12 disc.also a Caad 10 in a 54 which is fine ,Im taller than you & I think I should of went with a 52 in Caad 12,Cdale changed the sizing a few years ago,now my Caad 12 seat tube measures a 57,I like seat tube to show more than it is,my inseam is 30 in. anyways I took it apart & put everything on my Merckx San Remo which shifts badly so gonna look for somethin else maybe get another Allez but in disc.

  4. #4
    T K
    T K is online now
    wasssabi
    Reputation: T K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,076
    Quote Originally Posted by E 12 View Post
    So I've been riding a CAAD12 for sometime now in a 54. I've had people tell me that they thought it was too big (just based on geometry numbers, not necessarily how I looked on it). I'm ALMOST 5'8, like just barely under. Anyway, I've ridden the 54 with a 100mm stem for a long time, and never felt like I was on something too big. That said, I'm looking to move to an Evo, and obviously started looking at a 54. The geometry says that the Evo is a tiny bit smaller than the CAAD12 (at least the seat tube). But would there be a reason to also look at a 52? I'm not totally sure what I'd gain from it, but maybe placing my reach further over the front axle or something?
    Anyone can ride a bike a size bigger or smaller than optimum. Many pros now ride bikes a size or two smaller put a long stem on and slam it low. Lance (yes that one) liked to ride a bike one size too big. It's what feels comfortable to you. You didn't mention your inseam. If you have shorter legs the non sloping TT of a Cannondale may make the bike look bigger. I'm 5'8" with a 32" inseam and have owned 5 Cannondales all 54s with 100 stems and they have been perfect. Depending on your inseam you may a tweener. Try a 52 you never know.

Similar Threads

  1. CAAD12 vs EVO?
    By fdghsrtws in forum Cannondale
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-15-2015, 01:08 AM
  2. Standard EVO vs. Hi-Mod EVO
    By Hackney in forum Cannondale
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 04-17-2015, 03:30 AM
  3. Evo Hi Mod vs Evo Black Inc?
    By Yt- in forum Cannondale
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-17-2014, 10:27 AM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-03-2013, 05:33 AM
  5. 2010 Supersix Hi-MOD: Hi-MOD Team vs Hi-MOD D1
    By dimmy123 in forum Cannondale
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-06-2010, 07:42 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT ROADBIKEREVIEW

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2019 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.