Short Cyclist on XS frame (48cm) so shorter cranks?
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    128

    Short Cyclist on XS frame (48cm) so shorter cranks?

    I'm helping a coworker source and build her next bike... She's short... 5' tall and I can't help but think that there has to be some advantage to someone this short going to short cranks? Not just 170's but perhaps even 165s. She literally looks a bit awkward on the 172's she has now.

    Is there some train of thought around this? I have 172.5 on most of my bikes an 170's on a travelling bike that I do a lot of climbing with. I can't honestly say I notice a massive difference (If any)... Perhaps my Strava data would show something different... But not about me... About her...

    Thoughts? I'm sure a professional bike fit will get her pointed in the right direction but just looking to see what thoughts might be.
    2015 Guru Photon R Disc Custom - Super Record (15 lbs)
    2016 Olympia Boost Dura Ace Di2 (14.5 lbs)
    2019 Cannondale Synapse, Ultegra Di2 - Mavic Cosmic Carbons
    2016 Storck Aero Road Build - SRAM Red
    2006 Colnago Strada Scandium Record Group FSA cockpit/brakes and Mad Fibers (14 lbs)

    Road Team Sponsor and M3 Racer (Team Techykids.ca)


    Fav accessories:
    Mad Fibers, FSA Bars, Power2Max Power Meter Crankset(s), Mavic R-SYS SLR and Carbon Tubulars
    -Self admitted Weight Weenie!!!

  2. #2
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation: krisdrum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    3,425
    165s are probably a better choice. I'm 5-6 and run 170s on my road/cross bike. Frankly could maybe go shorter, as I do like to spin. But I think a professional fitter with lots of experience would be a good option.

    There was a recent video series on YouTube with an Australian rider (I think 5-10 or more) getting a fitting and was suggested he go from 172.5 down to 165 in order to help rotate his pelvis lower and deal with some hip flexibility issues. So not sure there is a hard and fast rule.

  3. #3
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    6,499
    165mm is the longest she should ever use.

    if possible, she should go down to 160mm or even shorter, but unfortunately the bigs don't sell 160mm or shorter, but customizers do sell them for a price
    https://www.bigandtallbike.com/RoadC...anks_c_93.html

  4. #4
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    636
    IMV, definitely go for 165mm as a maximum. Not only will it suit leg length better, it will also help a bit with toe overlap which is always a problem with XS frames (although Canyon use 650 wheels on some of those). Shorter than 165 would probably be better but as aclinjury says price and availability are issues

  5. #5
    Sooper Dooper Moderator!
    Reputation: il sogno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    19,410
    I'm 5' 4" and on a 48 cm frame. I use 170mm cranks.

  6. #6
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation: rudge66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    240
    Quote Originally Posted by il sogno View Post
    I'm 5' 4" and on a 48 cm frame. I use 170mm cranks.
    you're riding well if you can power ride your drop for a sustained period.
    Short cranks are the new market pitch. its just getting silly.

  7. #7
    Banned Sock Puppet
    Reputation: Lombard's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    11,365
    Quote Originally Posted by rudge66 View Post
    you're riding well if you can power ride your drop for a sustained period.
    Short cranks are the new market pitch. its just getting silly.
    The only thing silly here are your misleading posts. So you're saying that everybody regardless of size should use the same crank lengths?
    "COMPLACENCY IS LETHAL - VOTE in November." - System Shock.

    "With
    bicycles in particular, you need to separate between what's merely true and what's important."
    -- DCGriz, RBR.





  8. #8
    RoadBikeReview Member
    Reputation: rudge66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    240
    Quote Originally Posted by Lombard View Post
    The only thing silly here are your misleading posts. So you're saying that everybody regardless of size should use the same crank lengths?
    Hmmm.... did I say that?

    Focus Lombard, .. Bike Fit is not your forte.


    Nor are recommendations for $900 Claris bikes from Walmart
    Last edited by rudge66; 2 Weeks Ago at 04:52 PM.

  9. #9
    Banned Sock Puppet
    Reputation: Lombard's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    11,365
    Quote Originally Posted by rudge66 View Post
    Focus Lombard, .. Bike Fit is not your forte.
    Nor yours.

    Quote Originally Posted by rudge66 View Post
    Nor are recommendations for $900 Claris bikes from Walmart
    Did I say anything about Walmart? I don't think so.
    "COMPLACENCY IS LETHAL - VOTE in November." - System Shock.

    "With
    bicycles in particular, you need to separate between what's merely true and what's important."
    -- DCGriz, RBR.





Similar Threads

  1. Too Short for a 585 Optimum Elle XS
    By hawker12 in forum Look
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-14-2013, 12:12 PM
  2. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 05-13-2013, 03:35 PM
  3. Chainrings and shorter cranks
    By ddayton217 in forum Components, Wrenching
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-20-2012, 09:35 PM
  4. Longer top tube/shorter stem or shorter top tube longer stem
    By Ranger Pride in forum Beginner's Corner
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-15-2011, 09:50 PM
  5. Shorter Cranks Anyone?
    By Dereck in forum General Cycling Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-08-2006, 05:56 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT ROADBIKEREVIEW

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2020 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.